I also have a sneaking suspicion that there will come a time when, looking back, it will be obvious that APFS (and to a lesser or equal extent, Ext4. On the other hand, I did wish to convey to the OP that he needn't stray beyond additional volume(s) within the existing volume container, particularly so, on what is a single SSD within his Studio.Īs you mentioned mixing and matching HFS and/or exFAT on the same drive, I will only point out that additional volumes, rather than partitions, helps ensure that the file system remains as APFS which offers a far superior space allocation system for SSDs, plus the potential advantage of all volumes within the same container sharing available space. One of the best explanations of both APFS containers and APFS volume groups is this one by Bombich Software, the creators of Carbon Copy Cloner (an outfit that had to get up to speed quickly post introduction of APFS).Ĭlick to expand.I wasn't meaning to insinuate that there was anything particularly wrong with the information in your post, Mike. The volume group consists of one volume used for the system files (named Macintosh HD) and another volume used for data (named Macintosh HD - Data).' 'On your computer, macOS is installed on a set of volumes known as a volume group. Starting with macOS 10.15 Catalina, Apple introduced 'volume groups' (within volume containers), with the default group having both system and data volumes within, this as much for security as efficiency and flexibility (as the system volume is set to read-only, with to and fro access via hardlinks). These additional volumes, described as APFS containers can have different versions of macOS on, or simply be consigned as data storage. Click to expand.Apple recommend against creating multiple partitions on APFS drives, instead, it is suggested that users create multiple APFS volumes within a single partition.

Pink folder for mac